Apple v. Justice Department

The Department of Justice is suing Apple on charges of ‘collusion’, to do with ebook publishing deals before the iPad launch in 2010.

The Verge reports:

Turvey, Google’s director of strategic partnerships, was in federal court in Manhattan as a government witness. […]

Turvey told the court that in early 2010, representatives of the five accused publishers, all of which have settled with the government, told him directly that they were switching to the agency model because contracts they entered into with Apple required it. […]

By the end of the interview Turvey had gone from saying the publishers had told him directly, to saying they had merely told people on his team, to finally saying the publishers had "likely" told someone on his team.

Sounds pretty bad, right? But:

Much of what they [DOJ] were trying to prove with Turvey’s testimony, they had already established with Apple’s own emails, testimony from the likes of Penguin Books CEO David Shanks, and three separate Amazon executives.

If they already have testimony, why do they feel the need to field someone like this? What does Google have anything to do with it, except being a business rival to the defendants?

This case is completely weird, and continues to be so.

Amazon’s iPad competitor?

Marco Arment has an interesting piece about Amazon’s plans for the future, and whether it includes an iPad competitor. Go read!

I’ve been reading a few posts on this idea, and it makes sense: Amazon is the only company other than Apple with requisite technologies already set up: They have a large online store, they’re already capable of handing millions of users and their data, and now they’re venturing into the App Store side of things as well.

All they need now is an actual tablet, to complete the picture.